RSS Feed
Embed on Your Site


Filter by:

Feed Type:

Blog   Podcast   Sermon  


Andrew Preus   Brian Yamabe   Bryan Wolfmueller   Charles Henrickson   Christopher Esget   Divine Shepherd Lutheran Church   Dr. Matthew Phillips   Fr BFE (   Fr Bfe   God Whisperers   Gottesdienst Editorial   Issues Etc.   Jason Braaten   Jason Braaten (   Jim Pierce   Jkohlmeier   Lutherans in Africa   Matt Harrison   Mike Dobbs   Mumme   Nathan Redman   Norm Fisher   Pastor Adam Lehman   Pastor Charles St. Onge   Pastor Chris Hull   Pastor Christopher Gillespie   Pastor Clint Poppe   Pastor Daniel Hinton   Pastor David Jay Webber   Pastor David Juhl   Pastor David Ramirez   Pastor Derrick Brown   Pastor Donavon Riley   Pastor Eric Andersen   Pastor Esget   Pastor Gaven Mize   Pastor James May   Pastor Joel Koepp   Pastor John Frahm Iii   Pastor John Fraiser   Pastor John Wegener   Pastor John Wurst   Pastor Joseph Abrahamson   Pastor Joshua Gale   Pastor Joshua Scheer   Pastor Karl Weber   Pastor Mark Lovett   Pastor Mark Preus   Pastor Mark Schroeder   Pastor Martin Noland   Pastor Matt Richard   Pastor Mumme   Pastor Mumme (   Pastor Nathan Higgins   Pastor Peters   Pastor Randy Asburry   Pastor Sam Schuldheisz   Pastor Shawn Stafford   Pastor Tim Rossow   Pastor Tony Sikora   Paul Mumme   Paul T. McCain   Paul T. Mccain   Petersen   Petersen (   Pr. H. R.   Pr. H. R. (   Rev Tony Sikora   Rev. Anthony R. Voltattorni   Rev. Larry Beane   Rev. Larry Beane (   Rev. May   Rev. Rick Stuckwisch   Rev. Rick Stuckwisch (   Robert Paul   Scott Diekmann   Steadfast Lutherans   T. R. Halvorson   Table Talk Radio   Todd Wilken   Worldview Everlasting  

Grappling: Luther, Life and Anger (The Ten Commandments)

  Posted:Oct 24, 2016 By Bryan Wolfmueller (The Wolrd Wide Wolfmueller)

Remember, we’re looking for 25 likes and comments on YouTube. Thanks!

…more Grappling with the Text
…more Worldview Everlasting

The post Grappling: Luther, Life and Anger (The Ten Commandments) appeared first on World Wide Wolfmueller .


“The Pharisee and the Tax Collector” (Luke 18:9-17)

“The one who humbles himself will be exalted.” Now I don’t know if our Lord was talking about my Chicago Cubs there or not, but finally my humble Cubbies have been exalted. Well, actually, I do know: Jesus was not talking about the Cubs, because he said, “the one who humbles himself.” And it wasn’t that the Cubs were humbling themselves all those years, it was all the other teams humbling them. So maybe the Cubs being exalted now is just a matter of them having a whole bunch of good players. So no spiritual lesson to be learned there.

But there is a spiritual lesson to be learned in the words of Jesus today. It has to do with how we position ourselves before God. Listen again to Jesus’ words: “For everyone who exalts himself will be humbled, but the one who humbles himself will be exalted.” You see, now doesn’t that sound upside-down? But it’s true. And we see this principle at work in the story that Jesus tells, the parable of “The Pharisee and the Tax Collector.”

Jesus turns things upside-down from what people would expect in this parable. The Pharisee and the tax collector: The one you would expect to be praised is instead portrayed as haughty and headed for a fall. The one you would expect to be condemned is instead the one who goes home justified and will be exalted. Just upside-down from what you would expect.

The reason Jesus tells this parable is because his hearers needed to hear it. They are described as those “who trusted in themselves that they were righteous, and treated others with contempt.” It’s this self-righteousness and the looking down on others that Jesus will rebuke.

So Jesus begins this story. “Two men went up into the temple to pray, one a Pharisee and the other a tax collector.” Now right off the bat you would expect the Pharisee to be the good guy and the tax collector to be the bad guy. The Pharisees were widely regarded as the most moral, the most righteous, the most religious people in the community. In contrast, the tax collectors were looked down upon as generally being corrupt, crooked, and disloyal to the nation. Not much admirable about them. But there would be admirable things to say about the Pharisees.

And this Pharisee did not need much prodding to say those admirable things about himself. Even to God. The Pharisee is standing by himself there at the temple, and he prays like this: “God, I thank you that I am not like other men, extortioners, unjust, adulterers, or even like this tax collector. I fast twice a week; I give tithes of all that I get.” So this Pharisee is someone his culture would look at and they would praise him. They would look up to him. He was not a blatant, obvious sinner that everybody could identify and look down upon. He was not, for example, an extortioner or an adulterer.

Nor was this Pharisee a blatant, obvious sinner like the tax collector would be. The tax collectors as a group were looked down upon, because they had the reputation for being corrupt and crooked, known for lining their own pockets. These Jewish tax collectors were hated also because they were collecting taxes for the pagan Roman Empire; so they were seen as disloyal. The tax collectors made a convenient group for the Pharisees to compare themselves to and thus feel superior to.

So the Pharisee in the story was clearly not an outwardly manifest sinner. You would think he was a pretty pious fellow. And the Pharisee would have you know that he was. “I fast twice a week; I give tithes of all that I get.” Well, that’s pretty impressive. To fast, not just once or twice a year, but to fast twice a week–wow, what religious self-discipline! To give a tithe, to give ten percent of everything you have as an offering to God–such sacrificial giving! Why, this Pharisee would be at the top of the list of pious people to be praised and emulated.

But Jesus turns all that upside down. Because this Pharisee was trusting in these works of his to make himself righteous before God. He didn’t think of himself as a sinner. He thought he was superior to all those sinners who were not as good and righteous as he was. But in Jesus’ estimation, that is not praiseworthy. No, indeed, it is deadly. The Pharisee’s pride is what stands out in the way Jesus describes him. And it sets him in contrast to the next guy Jesus tells us about, namely, the tax collector.

The Pharisee stood by himself at the temple, because he was so outstanding and superior to everyone else. The tax collector, by way of contrast, stood afar off, because he sensed his unworthiness to come before God. Out of shame, he would not even lift up his eyes to heaven. Rather than patting himself on the back, this man was beating his breast in contrition. Rather than listing a litany of why God should be pleased with him, the tax collector simply says, “God, be merciful to me, a sinner!”

The tax collector recognizes his guilt before God. He confesses it. He knows he is a sinner. He’s not delighting in his sins; instead, he is sorrowing over them. And the only thing he can think of to say is not to make any excuses, but simply to turn to God and seek his mercy. “God, be merciful to me, a sinner.”

This is the prayer that Jesus praises. “God, be merciful to me, a sinner.” This is to let God be your righteousness. It is to recognize that you have no righteousness of your own to wave before God’s face. You are relying on what only God can provide: a righteousness outside yourself that you have no right to, but you know God is merciful and he offers to give it freely.

“Be merciful to me.” But why should God be merciful to you? On what basis? If you are a sinner, and if God is a just judge, then must God not punish you for your sins, lest he be found to be slacking in his justice? Yes. So how in the world can God be merciful to you?

“Be merciful to me,” the tax collector prays. The Greek word that’s used here is from the same root that’s used in Romans 3, where it says what God has done in order to be merciful to you. It says there that God put forward Christ Jesus as a “propitiation” by his blood. A propitiation? What’s that? And what does that have to do with God being merciful to sinners?

A propitiation is an atoning sacrifice. It is a sacrifice that makes atonement for sins, covers them, so that they are not counted against you. And that happened at the temple on the Day of Atonement, when the high priest would enter the Holy of Holies and sprinkle the blood of the prescribed sacrifice on the Ark of the Covenant. He sprinkled it on the lid, the cover, which was called the mercy seat. And that sacrifice, Romans 3 says, was pointing ahead to the propitiation, the atoning sacrifice, Christ would make by shedding his blood on the cross.

So there’s the connection. When the tax collector prays that God would be merciful to him, the basis for that mercy is that Christ would “mercy-seat” him by making the atoning sacrifice for his sins. And your sins also, dear Christian! You can pray to God to be merciful to you, because Jesus “mercy-seated” you by his blood on the cross. Your sins are atoned for, fully forgiven, because of what Jesus did for you. He is your righteousness. Plead that before God and not your own goodness. Don’t be afraid to be a sinner. Don’t excuse your sins; confess them. Recognize yourself as a sinner in need of God’s mercy. And by his mercy you too will go to your house justified. To be justified is to be declared righteous by God, not guilty before him, because your punishment has already been served by Christ and his righteousness is credited to your account.

“God, be merciful to me, a sinner.” You know, not everybody is ready to pray that prayer. Not everyone is willing to admit that they are a sinner. For example, there is a false teacher out there by the name of Joyce Meyer. Maybe you’ve heard of her. Did you know Joyce Meyer used to be a member of an LCMS church in St. Louis? But she no longer likes what our church teaches. You see, Joyce doesn’t think she’s that much of a sinner. She has said of her time in the Missouri Synod: “All I was ever taught to say was ‘I, a poor, miserable sinner.’ I am not poor, I am not miserable and I am not a sinner. That is a lie from the pit of hell.” Well, no, sorry, Joyce, you are the one spouting a lie. If you cannot confess that you are a poor miserable sinner, then you are deceiving yourself–and deceiving others. For the Bible says, in 1 John 1, “If we say we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us.” The truth is not in you, Joyce Meyer.

But there is a truth we can rely on, and it is this: “If we confess our sins, God, who is faithful and just, will forgive our sins and cleanse us from all unrighteousness.” Why? Because the blood of Jesus, God’s Son, cleanses us from all sin. God has “mercy-seated” us in Christ.

“God, be merciful to me, a sinner.” That was the tax collector’s prayer. And it is my prayer and your prayer too. And because God has been merciful to you, by sending Christ to be the atoning sacrifice for your sins, this is how you will go down to your house today justified, declared righteous, not with a righteousness of your own, but with the perfect righteousness of Christ. “For everyone who exalts himself will be humbled, but the one who humbles himself will be exalted.”

The post “The Pharisee and the Tax Collector” (Sermon on Luke 18:9-17, by Pr. Charles Henrickson) appeared first on Steadfast Lutherans .


Awkward hands. . .

  Posted:Oct 23, 2016 By Pastor Peters (Pastoral Meanderings)
Having had a couple family weddings in the last year, I am familiar a bit with staged photographs.  It is clear from what I have seen that hands remain a problem for folks.  What to do with them, that is.  I still recall my mother telling me as a boy to get my hands out of my pockets.  I wish a few folks on those photos had heard her voice and remembered what she said.  We are often in a quandary over what to do with our hands -- do they belong in our pockets, at our sides, clasped. . . where do they go?  I know a few folks who should probably put their hands in their pockets no matter what my mom would say.  They are dangerous hand talkers and their hands are literally all over the place -- all over you if you are not quick!

We say that idle hands are the devil's workshop.  Speaking again of pictures, how many shots have been spoiled by someone's lame attempt at humor and some finger horns placed above somebody else's head?  Hands can get us into more than a little trouble.  Ask anyone who has been caught red-handed, so to speak, with the goods they did not pay for!

When someone is not so mechanically inclined, we often described them as unhandy while the one who does well with tools is called a handy man.  Hands are good things even if they sometimes get us into trouble.  No where are we more troubled with what to do with our hands than in worship.  Even the pastors sometimes find themselves awkwardly trying to figure out what to do with hands that seem either out of place or uncomfortable no matter how you hold them.  It is one of the reasons I long ago went to the classic fingers and palms touching pose of prayer for all those moments in the liturgy when the place of our hands is left unspecified.  Without this practice it is a great temptation to either organize things (hymnal, bulletin, etc...) or wring my hands unconsciously.  It is a small discipline to keep them together and focus on other things. I wish more of us felt the need to solve the problem of what to do with our hands.  Some of us feel the constant need to do something with them -- anything -- and it is nothing but distracting for those folks around us.

Often we might describe someone as working with their hands.  My dad certainly did this.  He was a plumber, electrician, and HVAC man who owned a hardware store for 58 years.  He worked with his hands though not only his hands.  We as Christians also work with our hands.  Our hands joined in prayer symbolize part of the work of the baptized, our calling or vocation.  We are called by God to pray not only out of need but out of concern for the people and things of value to our world.  Prayer is part of the baptismal vocation, the right use of God's name is, after all, to call upon Him in prayer, praise, and thanksgiving.  The children of Israel may have lifted hands in prayer, we fold them as we endeavor to so the same thing -- to pray.

Emotions find their way into our hands -- from the fist gripped in anger or fear to the open palm extended in welcome to dancing hands of a happy heart.  You see this also in the way pastors hold their hands at certain points in the Divine Service -- extended, folded, uplifted, etc...  I guess I am just old fashioned enough to wish that more pastors were taught to fold their hands in the classic position of prayer throughout the liturgy.  Hands can be distracting.  If it is a good discipline to teach our children, it is good enough for us to practice also.  Hands give us subtle and some not so subtle messages.  It is good when our hands before us reflect the posture of heart and mind -- especially within the Divine Service.

1 Timothy 2:8 - I will therefore that men pray every where, lifting up holy hands, without wrath and doubting.  Psalm 63:4 - Thus will I bless thee while I live: I will lift up my hands in thy name.  Luke 24:50 - And he led them out as far as to Bethany, and he lifted up his hands, and blessed them.  Ezra 9:5 - And at the evening sacrifice I arose up from my heaviness; and having rent my garment and my mantle, I fell upon my knees, and spread out my hands unto the LORD my God. . .

Passion is overrated. . .

  Posted:Oct 22, 2016 By Pastor Peters (Pastoral Meanderings)
While talking to a group of people helping their congregation sort through the call process and elect a pastor, I heard them often speak of the desire to find out what the candidate's passion was.  It was as if this was the defining key to the individual and would thus give them the information they needed to figure out who was the magic man to be their shepherd.

I did not say anything at the time but it has since bothered me more and more.  The whole idea of a person's passion as that which defines them is a false one.  Now I am not saying I do not have passion, but my passions are hardly the lens through which I make sense.  In fact, just the opposite, I fear my passions only confound and confuse who I am.  For in most cases, my passions are not the faithful steeds who pull me to greatness but the rebellious stallions who must be controlled and kept under bit and bridle or they will undo me.

That does not mean that all passion is sin but that passion itself is dangerous.  Passion is impetuous and indulgent.  It skews the values we should assign to certain things and tends to turn life upside down by our new found want or desire.  Passion is more than anything else the pursuit of happiness (or pleasure, if you can separate that from happiness).

We live in an age in which we are told not to settle for a job but to find a place to pursue your passion (and one hopefully that will pay you extremely well to go after what makes you happy).  But what about all those unpleasant jobs that must be done?  Are there people whose passion really is snaking out a plugged up drain or spraying for pests and varmints or looking at people's diseased feet and rear ends?  Life is filled with things that have nothing to do with anyone's passion but they are still worthy things that must be done.  No parent relishes changing a baby's blow out mess in a diaper which has barely contained the toxic substance but this, too, is part of parental vocation.

Don't ask what the pastor's passion may be.  You don't want a pastor who has only passion.  You need a pastor who may not do all things well or with equal enthusiasm but who does them all -- from preaching to teaching to administering the sacraments to visiting the sick to burying the dead to catechizing the youth and those new to the faith, etc...  What happens if your pastor's passion is really video games?  Or golf?  Or fishing?  You had better hope that he has something more than passion and it would help if he had some self-control or do you plan on paying him to play video games, tee up on the green, or haul in a prize walleye?

Truth told, we would all be better off with a pastor who in most things is average but who has a strong sense of duty and self-control.  Passion is overrated.  Consistency and constancy is underrated.  The people were following the typical path of trying to find out who is the real guy behind the personal information forms they received but they were mistaken.  We are not defined by our passions.  We are characterized by the things we do not want to do but we make ourselves do over and over again because they need to be done -- the messy, dirty, unpleasant but essential things to life and work.

The sad truth is that our passions are usually for things that do not matter all that much.  We have a passion for social media but it has not satisfied our desire for friendship and we are online but still lonely.  We have a passion for pleasure but the shape of this pleasure seems to be solitary games on smartphones and tablets and computers as well as porn that substitutes for true love.  We have a passion for self but the cost of such self-centeredness is often the pursuit of anything more than the feeling and whim of the moment.  The reality is that your dream job may only ever be a dream, that your perfect spouse may not exist in flesh and blood, that your passions are better the good things that you must learn to value more than innate instincts and desires.

Passion is overrated.  Steadfastness under pressure and in the face of unpleasantness is underrated in church and home and life.  It is just as dangerous to talk about faith as passion or it may be as distant from us as the unfulfilled dreams that occupy our idle moments.  If we only go to church when we feel like it, we will not go at all.  If we do not pray except when we cannot avoid the urgency or when we really want to pray, we will never pray.  If we take personal devotion time only when we have the time or the desire, our spiritual lives will grow stale and sterile.  If we read Scripture only when we are passionate about it, the cover will gather dust.  Passion is overrated.  Force yourself to do what is good and right and salutary and pray the Lord that these may become your new and true passions.

forsythe Clarke Forsythe of
Americans United for Life

Americans United for Life

Tags:   mp3   

SONY DSC Pastor Brian Kachelmeier of Redeemer Lutheran-Los Alamos, NM

Redeemer Theological Academy

Tags:   mp3   

2953. Issues, Etc. Comment Line and Listener Email, 10/21/16

  Posted:Oct 21, 2016 By Issues Etc. (Issues Etc)

email Audio Open Lines

Tags:   mp3   

2950. Morning Chapel from Kramer Chapel, 10/21/16

  Posted:Oct 21, 2016 By Issues Etc. (Issues Etc)

chapel October 21, 2016

Tags:   mp3   

Here is another guest article on the proposed revisions to the Catechism:


20161006_143222_resized The 1912 and 1943 Small Catechism published by Concordia Publishing House called the fifth chief part “The Office of the Keys, Confession.” In 1991, the explanation of the Small Catechism simply called the Fifth Chief part “Confession” while placing “The Office of the Keys” after the explanation of “Confession” and also after “A Short Form of Confession”. The return of “The Office of the Keys” to before “Confession” was a good correction because it more clearly ties the use of the keys to the establishment of the Office of the Holy Ministry.

To obtain such faith God instituted the office of preaching, giving the gospel and the sacraments. Through these, as through means, he gives the Holy Spirit who produces faith, where and when he wills, in those who hear the gospel. [1]



While critical scholars may doubt that Luther wrote and/or intended a section in the Small Catechism to address “The Office of the Keys,” it is impossible to read Lutheran writings on Baptism and the Lord’s Supper without seeing this “office” as constitutive of the proclamation of the Gospel itself.

The Church is the congregation of saints (Psalm 149:1) in which the Gospel is purely taught and the Sacraments are correctly administered. [2]

Since the “giving of the gospel and the sacraments” takes place through the word rightly preached and the sacraments correctly administered, Luther correctly understood The Office of the Keys and Confession between Baptism (gift of faith) and the Lord’s Supper (strengthening of faith). [3]


Structure: Placement of The Office of the Keys in Catechism

As part of the holy sacraments of Baptism and the Lord’s Supper, the Office of the Keys is given and functions to exercise the confessing of sins for the sake of receiving absolution. Baptism relates to Confession and Absolution in that the whole purpose of Confession is to again and again receive the strengthening of faith by the assurance that the sinner is forgiven on account of Christ’s vicarious satisfaction. In Confession and Absolution after Baptism, the sinner hears hear again and again, “be of good cheer, you are baptized into the death and resurrection of Jesus.”  Thus, Confession and Absolution is a return to the font.

Luther, taking a cue from the Lord Jesus and St. Paul, taught that the Office of the Keys is part of examination and preparation for the Sacrament of the Altar. This is best accomplished within the context of private confession to a pastor [4] who is authorized to exercise the binding and loosing key within the Office on behalf of the congregation.

It is also helpful to have the section on Church Discipline within the Office of the Keys since it is the Church’s public exercising of the loosing and binding key.

 “Our people teach as follows. According to the gospel the power of the keys or of the bishops is a power and command of God to preach the gospel, to forgive and retain sin, and to administer and distribute sacraments.” [5]


Bible Passages

Nothing new here.  The usual two Bible passages are given having to do with the use of the keys (Matt. 18:18) and then the establishment of the Office (John 20:22-23). Also included is Matthew 16:19.

Psalm 32:5 is a welcome new Bible passage in this section that the 1991 explanation does not use. It harkens back to the opening versicles of the Common Service (LSB, p. 184, Setting III) where the pastor and congregation speak responsively: “I said I will confess my transgressions unto the Lord, and Thou forgavest the iniquity of my sins.” Showing how the Divine Service liturgy connects to the Office of the Keys is a very good teaching point.


Comments on the Questions

The Questions under The Office of the Keys and Confession have been totally reordered and generally speaking fit better within each heading.

300-302                These questions concerning the establishment of the Office of the Keys are more clear and complete. The answers now include repentance as the basis for which way the key will turn. The answer for Q. 302 has been completely reworked to clearly confess that “outside of the Christian Church, where there is no Gospel, there is also no forgiveness of sins.” A great quotation from the Large Catechism concerning the goal of the Christian Church supports this answer. I hope they don’t change it, but I would not be surprised to see it’s exclusivity softened.

303-306                 These questions are nearly identical to the 1991 explanation. One omission is question 276 from the current edition: “What is the necessary result of repentance?” Answer: “Then good works, which are the fruits of repentance, are bound to follow” (Augsburg Confession XII 6). This is a welcome difference because of the structural change. It is undeniable that good works are bound to follow repentance. However, such a discussion probably best fits under the fourth part of Baptism.

307-309                 “What is excommunication?” is the foundation for the successive questions. Lacking is a clear statement that the Church speaks on behalf of Christ when she excommunicates. The answer to question 308 could be improved. Excommunication does not only serve the purpose of showing the impenitent the seriousness of his sin.  (Tangent…why the “his or her?”  It’s sloppy writing.  Just say “his” and get over political correctness.) Excommunication also serves as a warning to others (see 1 Timothy 5:20 and 1 Corinthians 5:6) and it purifies the Church (see Deuteronomy 13:5; 17:12). The primary purpose of excommunication is to win the brother, but it does serve in other ways.

310                          Though it may be redundant, restating John 20:22-23 would bring unmistakable clarity.

311                          This is excellent. It takes head on some of the problems that have plagued Missouri since the 1989 Wichita Convention.

312                          Again, this is well done.

313                          The answer could be made stronger with the following: “Congregations are to call men who have been prepared and examined by the Church and thus deemed spiritually qualified in life and doctrine to serve as pastors.” Question 278 in the 1991 edition says nothing about doctrine. It rightly emphasizes the life of the man but does not speak about his teaching. Yet Paul in Titus 1:9 makes clear that the ability to preach and teach sound doctrine is a necessity for the Office. False teaching is the enemy of the Gospel. False teaching defames God’s name. The man in the Office must have sound doctrine to combat false teaching and to instruct in the truth.

314                          Take a look back at the first word to the answers given in 311-312.  “No.”  Yet for some unbeknownst reason the answer to this question does not give the same reply.  Why change the format?  I fear the change is because we don’t want to sound too harsh.  I appreciate bringing up the ordering of life in God’s creation, for it grounds the basis for men serving in the Office of the Holy Ministry in Genesis 1-2. Women can’t be pastors because they are not the divinely instituted heads of their households. But this talk of men and women being “redeemed and gifted for service in Christ’s Church” does not answer the question. What does “service in Christ’s Church” mean?  It leaves too many doors open for women to serve in ways the Lord has not given to them. A better answer would be, “No.  God’s Word prohibits women from serving in the pastoral office.” Let God’s Word speak and don’t worry about seeking to justify it.



Though there are weaknesses, this is a good section. In an age where church discipline is unthinkable to some, it’s good to be reminded of what the Lord has to say. The Office of the Keys works to bind and to loose. If Christians are unwilling to use the binding key, the loosing key will be lost. The Gospel is for sinners. The Gospel is not for those who do no wrong. The comfort of the loosing key is precisely why the Lord established the Office of the Holy Ministry. His appointed men are “absolution men.” They are placed into the Lord’s Office to bind when necessary but always for the goal of loosing by pronouncing Christ’s very words: “I forgive you all your sins in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit.”

Rev. James J.  Stefanic
Good Shepherd Lutheran Church
Marshall, MN


Endnotes —

[1] Kolb/Wengert, Book of Concord, Augsburg Confession , (Fortress Press, 2000) Art. V., par. 1-3, p. 40.

[2] Ibid., Art. VII., par. 1, p. 43.

[3] This connection of “The Office of the Keys, Confession” to Baptism (Smalcald Articles (S.A.) Article V) and The Sacrament of the Altar (S.A. Article VI) is evident in another of Luther’s writings contained in the Book of Concord called the Smalcald Articles. Here, Luther places the Article of the Office of the Keys after these two sacraments and before Confession and Absolution and Excommunication.

[4] See the Apology of the Augsburg Confession , Article XXIV, par. 1.

[5] Kolb/Wengert, Book of Concord, Augsburg Confession , (Fortress Press, 2000) Art. XXVIII, ln. 5-6, p. 92.

The post Proposed Catechism Explanation Revision — The Office of the Keys appeared first on Steadfast Lutherans .


Dropkick: The KJV Conundrum

  Posted:Oct 21, 2016 By Worldview Everlasting (Worldview Everlasting)

We answer a viewer question about extra words in the KJV translation of the bible, as well as deal with the Christian experience of anger.


The post Dropkick: The KJV Conundrum appeared first on Worldview Everlasting .


Sermo Dei: Trinity 21, 2016

  Posted:Oct 21, 2016 By Pastor Esget (Esgetology)

Why does God treat us this way? Why does He wait and wait? Why does He seem so distant?

For all the tender depictions of Jesus—welcoming a child, or gently cuddling a lamb—the picture we get from the Gospels is a Jesus who is aloof, austere, uncaring, unfeeling. He tells people off and turns over tables. Today’s gospel (John 4:46-54)  takes place in Cana. The last time He was there, His own mother came to Him with a problem, and Jesus replies, “Woman, what does your concern have to do with Me?” A woman with a sick daughter begs Jesus to help, and first he doesn’t answer her, then He calls her a dog. When He hears that Lazarus is sick, Jesus is in no hurry at all.

So today. A nobleman comes to Jesus. His little boy has a fever, and it isn’t breaking. He’s going to die. His father has traveled about eighteen miles over rough terrain; it would take more than a day to make this trip. All the while you know he’s sad, anxious, angry, worried. He’s desperate.

I think you know how this father feels. If not this particular situation before, you’ve been desperate. Perhaps today you are desperate about something. Some part of life has overwhelmed you: you are lonely; caring for your children is simply too much to manage; lust fills you, you act on it, followed by disgust and self-loathing; your back or your knees give off a searing pain that makes you just want to quit.

And perhaps, when things get really bad, you finally start to pray. And you can pray and pray for weeks and months and years with no answer. Total silence from a God who seems to mock you, taunt you, maybe hate you.

So does Jesus appear to this anxious, desperate father. But in the nobleman’s trouble, then the rebuke, and then the long uncertain journey home, we find out there is a purpose to the Lord’s austerity. Jesus is not holding out on giving the nobleman what he asks for—He intends to give him something far greater.

The nobleman has come because he wanted his little boy saved. He has a certain amount of faith – at least a hope that Jesus can save his child from death. Although he begs Jesus to come to his home, Jesus refuses. Why? By sending the man home with only a word, a word of promise, the man comes to see and receive something far greater than his child’s life.

The nobleman left Cana with just the word, “Your son lives.” What exactly does that mean? Jesus does not say to him, “Your son will live,” or “Your son will not die.” Just, “Your son lives.” That’s all he has to go on. He believes it, but there is clearly something imperfect about the belief. But when the nobleman meets his servants on the way back, they tell him that the fire, the fever has left his little boy; he lives! Learning the fever broke at the same time that Jesus had given him the Word, now we find a reiteration and intensification of belief. “And he himself believed, and his whole household.” This goes beyond just belief that the boy would be healed. The man and his whole family become disciples of Jesus.

You see, Jesus never wanted just the healing of the boy. He wanted the healing of the family. The purpose and mission of Jesus is to do something more than give some improvement in people’s health or happiness for a time. He has come to overturn the entire order of the world.

What do we see among the world’s rulers? Lies and deception, greed and corruption, sexual depravity, endless war. Jesus called that nobleman, probably a member of King Herod’s court, to a very different kind of life. A life that would turn away from the decadence of Herod to discipleship following Christ.

What needs to change in your life? What decadence and decay needs to be overturned? We can learn much from the nobleman. His new discipleship he immediately passed on to his family. Yesterday Eric and Julie Hutchins’s son Ryan was baptized into Christ, and today we saw Stephen and Sajini Gundry’s daughter Samantha joined to Jesus’ death and resurrection. It’s the most important responsibility parents have: to bring their children to Jesus, and train them up in His Word.

And that training involves hardship, for all disciples must undergo discipline. We are disciplined by the Lord, we are chastised and taught patience and not given what we want when we want it because the Lord has something far greater for us than immediate gratification.

The answer to your prayers – a healing, a spouse, a job, a child – is not the ultimate thing, and may be the opposite of what you need. The healed person still dies. What Jesus gives is not a respite from death but its ultimate overturning. He promises not a few more years but resurrection.

The healing that you most need is the healing of your soul from its anger, lust, dissatisfaction, selfishness, and pride. Today’s epistle reminds us that we are in a war, not with the other political party, or with Syria, Iran, or Russia: we are in a war with the devil and our own corrupt flesh.

Today you leave here with the same thing the nobleman got: a Word from Jesus. I have nothing else to offer you. I cannot promise you things will get better. But you have something far better than anything money or power can obtain. The Word Jesus send you home with, the Word Jesus sends you down the uncertain road with contains a better certainty: “In baptism you are joined to My death, and also My resurrection. My body is yours in this Eucharist, and My blood is your life. All other food you consume, but this food consumes you, your soul into righteousness, your body into immortality. Leave with Me your desperation, your anxiety, your uncertainty, and go home with this Word in your pocket: Fear not; I have redeemed you.” +INJ+